↓ Skip to main content

American Public Health Association

Article Metrics

Limited Role of Bots in Spreading Vaccine-Critical Information Among Active Twitter Users in the United States: 2017–2019

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Public Health, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Limited Role of Bots in Spreading Vaccine-Critical Information Among Active Twitter Users in the United States: 2017–2019
Published in
American Journal of Public Health, October 2020
DOI 10.2105/ajph.2020.305902
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam G. Dunn, Didi Surian, Jason Dalmazzo, Dana Rezazadegan, Maryke Steffens, Amalie Dyda, Julie Leask, Enrico Coiera, Aditi Dey, Kenneth D. Mandl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Computer Science 3 7%
Decision Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 16 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#205,109
of 21,859,856 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Public Health
#558
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,504
of 330,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Public Health
#11
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,859,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.