| Title |
Limited Role of Bots in Spreading Vaccine-Critical Information Among Active Twitter Users in the United States: 2017–2019
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Public Health, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2105/ajph.2020.305902 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam G Dunn, Didi Surian, Jason Dalmazzo, Dana Rezazadegan, Maryke Steffens, Amalie Dyda, Julie Leask, Enrico Coiera, Aditi Dey, Kenneth D Mandl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 47% |
| United States | 6 | 32% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2023.
All research outputs
#283,903
of 25,390,970 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Public Health
#691
of 12,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,434
of 420,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Public Health
#15
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,970 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.